File talk:Tibet-claims.jpg

Pakistan and Indian claims are kashmir are incorrectly depicted. =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:04, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Aksai Chin isn't claimed by China as a part of Tibet, but of Xinjiang, so it's not depicted on the map. --Yuje 21:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there still an active dispute?—Nat Krause^(Talk!) 23:12, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is the green area that is so small? is that meant to cover the whole of Aksai Chin? --Astrokey44 11:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

No sources are given for the territorial claims indicated on the map and its caption. I've pointed that out on the discussion page on Wikimedia on 18 November 2006. There has been no reply, so I've removed the map from the article on Tibet. —Babelfisch 06:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to understand

The map is hard to understand. Should be reworked to be clearer. 66.92.146.86 (talk) 19:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)↑đ[reply]

Doesn't show culturally-Tibetan parts of Nepal

Northern parts of Nepal, especially in and beyond the Greater Himalaya, are mostly Tibetan in language and cultural affinities. LADave (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

color key

perhaps the color key box on the main page could also be duplicated here? 76.168.166.62 (talk) 01:25, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

color key

perhaps the color key box on the main page could also be duplicated here? 76.168.166.62 (talk) 01:25, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]